Facebook Feed

5 days ago

Yoram Ettinger
2023 Jewish demographic momentum in Israel: bit.ly/40qV0aV ... See MoreSee Less
View on Facebook

4 weeks ago

Yoram Ettinger
Purim Guide for the Perplexed 2023: bit.ly/3ZdlxHY ... See MoreSee Less
View on Facebook

4 weeks ago

Yoram Ettinger
אתגר מרכזי לביטחון לאומי: bit.ly/3xkSwh1 ... See MoreSee Less
View on Facebook

Video #17: The US Congress – the co-equal ally of Israel

Video#17: http://bit.ly/2crlMIP; entire video-seminar: http://bit.ly/1ze66dS
1. In 1991, Senator Daniel Inouye (D-HI) was asked by the Secretary of the Navy to rescind an amendment to the Defense Appropriations Bill – upgrading the port of Haifa facilities for the benefit of the Sixth Fleet – the Senator responded: “According to the US Constitution, the Subcommittee on Defense supervises the Department of the Navy and not vice versa.” The amendment remained intact, in defiance of pressure by powerful Secretary of State, Jim Baker.  From 1990-92, Senators Inouye (D-HI), Kasten (R-WI) and Stevens (R-AK) initiated a series of amendments, expanding US-Israel strategic cooperation, despite rough presidential opposition.
2. When requested to support an initiative of President Clinton, based on partisan loyalty, Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV) stated: “I am the obedient servant of the Constitution, not the President!”
3. Following a meeting with an Israeli dignitary, who contended that the president was supreme in the area of foreign policy, Senate Majority Leader, George Mitchell (D-ME) quipped: “Yoram, didn’t you tell our distinguished guest that the US is not a monarchy?!”
4. When asked whether President Clinton was guaranteed the backing of the 1993 Democrat-controlled House and Senate, Speaker Tom Foley (D-WA) advised his Chief-of-Staff, Werner Brandt: “President Clinton should not take congressional support for granted, because our political life expectancy is different than his.”  
5. Congressional independence is bolstered by prescribing House Members and Senators – as well as Governors – different constituency, terms, timetable and agenda than those assigned to the president and to each other. Constrained by a two-term-limit, presidents rush to accomplish their nation-wide agenda within 4-8 years, while House Members and Senators benefit from two and six-year-unlimited-terms, which enable them to adopt a long-term, gradual approach, advancing an agenda, which may be inconsistent with a presidential agenda.
6. House Members and Senators prefer to focus on domestic issues which are the most critical to their reelection. They tend to defer to the president on external issues, but are capable of flexing formidable muscle when presidents assume an overly imperial posture, outrageously usurp power, disregard Congress, violate laws, pursue strikingly failed policies, or depart dramatically from the public consensus (e.g., Vietnam, Watergate, Iran Gate).
7. The first article of the US Constitution is dedicated to the Legislature, Congress. The powers, structure and procedures of the national legislature are outlined in considerable detail in the Constitution, unlike those of the Executive and the Judiciary.
8. The president is the commander-in-chief, but only as authorized and appropriated by Congress, which is entrusted with the Power of the Purse (funding, defunding, suspending, “fencing,” etc.). Congress possesses the muscle to check, defy, oversee, overrule, direct, fund and defund presidential policies, including foreign policy and national security.
9. The power of the co-equal, co-determining US Congress is unique among western democracies, deriving its potency from the constituent, not from party leadership or the president. It reflects the intent of the Founding Fathers to secure civil liberties by constraining the Executive, highlighting the centrality of the constituent and loyalty to the constituent over loyalty to the party. Hence, the concepts of limited government, separation of shared-overlapped-conflicting powers, the diffusion of power, checks and balance (e.g., treaty ratification, confirmation of senior appointments, veto and veto override), the congressional power of the purse, oversight, declaration of war, establishment/abolishment of executive departments and agencies, impeachment, etc.
10. In defiance of presidents, Congress ended US military involvement in Vietnam (the Eagleton, Cooper and Church amendments), Angola (the Clark Amendment) and Nicaragua (the Boland Amendment); overrode Reagan’s veto and brought down the white regime in South Africa; halted the supply of AWACs to Iran on the eve of the Khomeini revolution; overhauled the US intelligence apparatus (the Church/Pike Committees); and forced the USSR/Russia to allow emigration of one million Jews to Israel (the Jackson-Vanik amendment enacted in defiance of the president); etc.
11. On August 1, 2014, Democratic senators forced President Obama to de-link the $225mn funding of the Iron Dome anti-missile batteries from the $2.7bn Immigration and Border Security Bill. In September 2012, Congress blocked a $450 million cash transfer to Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood. On February 17, 2011, Obama vetoed a UN Security Council condemnation of Israel’s settlements policy, due to the pressure of Democratic Senators.  In May, 2009, Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) foiled Obama’s attempts to close down the Guantanamo detention camp. In 2009, the Senate prevented Obama’s appointment of Chas Freeman to chair the National Intelligence Council.  The Senate has yet to ratify the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea and the 1999 Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.
12. Congressional power has been dramatically bolstered since the Vietnam War, Watergate, IranGate and globalization, which have amplified the involvement of most legislators in the international arena, elevated the quality and quantity of some 15,000 Congressional staffers, and dramatically upgraded the oversight capabilities of Congress, the most authentic representative of the American people, a systematic supporter of Israel, the co-equal, co-determining branch of government.
13.  The next video will highlight Palestinian demographic manipulation.



Videos

The post-1967 turning point of US-Israel cooperation

Israeli benefits to the US taxpayer exceed US foreign aid to Israel

Iran - A Clear And Present Danger To The USA

Exposing the myth of the Arab demographic time bomb

Congress – the co-equal and systematic ally of Israel

Presidents propose and Congress disposes

On September 23, 2021, the US House of Representatives voted 420:9 to replenish the Israeli-developed defensive “Iron Dome” missiles, which are increasingly manufactured – and eventually exported – by the US defense company Raytheon, that benefits from the battle-tested “Israeli laboratory.”

The overwhelming vote reflects Congressional realization that the “Iron Dome”:

*Enhances Israel’s posture of deterrence, which is critical to the survival of all pro-US Arab regimes and minimization of regional instability;
*Reduces the need for full-scale Israeli wars on Palestinian and Islamic terrorism;
*Provides an alternative to Israeli military ground-operations against Palestinian terrorists, which would entail substantial Israeli and Palestinian fatalities;
*Represents joint US-Israel interests, militarily and technologically, in the face of mutual threats (e.g., Islamic terrorism) and mutual challenges (e.g., developing world-class, game-changing technologies).

*Constitutes another example of the systematic support by Congress of enhanced US-Israel cooperation.

The decisive role played by Congress in the replenishment of the “Iron Dome” underscores the cardinal rule of the US political system: The President proposes, but Congress disposes.

The involvement of Senators and House Representatives in foreign policy and national security-related issues has surged since the Vietnam War, Watergate and Iran Gate scandals, the dismantling of the USSR (which transformed the world from a bi-polar to a multi-polar) and rapidly-expanding globalization.

In fact, former Secretary of State, Jim Baker, complained about the growing congressional assertiveness in the area of foreign policy: “You can’t conduct foreign policy with 535 Secretaries of State….”  Former Secretary of Defense, Dick Cheney, criticized Congress for micromanaging the defense budget: dictating how much to spend on particular weapons, imposing detailed requirements and programmatic restrictions, venturing into policy-setting and requesting that the Department of Defense submits mountains of reports.

Congressional muscles 

The US Congress is the most powerful legislature in the world, and it has demonstrated its co-equal, co-determining muscle in the areas of foreign and defense policies on many occasions, such as:

*Imposing sanctions against foreign countries in defiance of Presidents Clinton, Obama and Trump (e.g., Egypt – 2012, Iran – 1996-97 and 2013, Russia – 2017);
*Non-ratification of the 2015 JCPOA, which enabled withdrawal by the US;
*The 2009 non-closure of the Guantanamo Detention Camp was led by Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid (NV-D), in defiance of President Obama.
*The 2009 non-confirmation of Charles Freeman to the Director of National Intelligence was led by Senator Chuck Schumer (NY-D);
*The 1999 non-ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty in defiance of President Clinton and the international community;
*The unprecedented expansion of US-Israel strategic cooperation took place despite stiff opposition by President Bush and Secretary of State Baker;
*The Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act overrode President Reagan’s veto;
*The 1984 Boland Amendment aborted President Reagan’s financial and military aid to anti-Communist elements in Nicaragua;
*The 1983 blocking of President Reagan’s attempted coup against the Surinam pro-Soviet regime;
*The 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act mandated congressional authorization of surveillance of persons and organizations, which may threaten national security;
*The 1975/76 Tunney (CA-D) and Clark Amendments stopped financial and military covert support of the opposition to the pro-Soviet regime in Angola;
*The 1973 Church-Case Amendment ended funding of military involvement in Southeast Asia;
*The 1973 War Powers Act overrode President Nixon’s veto;
*The Jackson-Vanik Amendment preconditioned aid to Moscow upon free immigration.

Congress empowered by the Constitution

As documented in the aforementioned paragraphs, one is advised to note that while Congress is preoccupied with District and State issues, it has the power to both propose and dispose in the areas of foreign and defense policies.

The US Constitution aspires for a limited government and a non-monarchical president, and therefore does not limit Congress to overseeing the budget. It provides the Senate and the House of Representatives with the power to act on strategic issues and policy-setting.

The Constitution accords Congress ”the power of the purse,” oversight of government operations, ratification of treaties, confirmation of key appointments, declaration of war, funding of military operations and cooperation with foreign entities, creation and elimination of government agencies, imposing sanctions on foreign governments, etc.

In other words, the President is the “commander in-chief” within constraints, which are set by Congress.




Videos

The post-1967 turning point of US-Israel cooperation

Israeli benefits to the US taxpayer exceed US foreign aid to Israel

Iran - A Clear And Present Danger To The USA

Exposing the myth of the Arab demographic time bomb