Facebook Feed

2 weeks ago

Yoram Ettinger
Purim Guide for the Perplexed 2023: bit.ly/3ZdlxHY ... See MoreSee Less
View on Facebook

2 weeks ago

Yoram Ettinger
אתגר מרכזי לביטחון לאומי: bit.ly/3xkSwh1 ... See MoreSee Less
View on Facebook

2 weeks ago

Yoram Ettinger
US-sponsored anti-Israel UN Security Council statement - acumen: bit.ly/3lVqpCM ... See MoreSee Less
View on Facebook

2 weeks ago

Yoram Ettinger
bit.ly/3xHPCDc הסכמי אברהם – אינטרס ערבי, אמריקאי וישראלי: ... See MoreSee Less
View on Facebook

“Security 101” – Passover 2006

How realistic are those, who blur the security irreplaceability of the Judea & Samaria (J&S) mountain ridges, which constitute the “Golan Heights” of Jerusalem, of the Tel Aviv-Jerusalem freeway and of the coastal plain?

 

If they would merely assume that the peace treaty with Jordan, and the demise of the Saddam regime, have eliminated the deadly threat from Israel’s eastern front, DA’YE’NOU (it would have sufficed).

However, US military presence in Iraq is transient. Its termination could severely destabilize the Mideast, prompting a radical regime in Baghdad, exacerbating the Iranian and Syrian threats and toppling the regimes in Riad, Amman and Cairo. In 1967, Israel demolished the military infrastructure of Egypt, Syria and Jordan, and developed the concept of “Low Probability” for Arab offensive. But, in 1973, the concept collapsed with a surprise Arab attack, and Israel barely escaped annihilation. In 1979, Iran was violently transformed from a cardinal ally to a sworn enemy, and the 1993 Oslo vision of peace was abruptly transformed into a nightmare of unprecedented wave of Palestinian terrorism. There is no free lunch for wishful-thinkers in the Mideast.

 

If they would solely contend that the 21st century strategic thinking is overlooking topography in general and land barriers in particular, DA’YE’NOU.

However, the US – with its most modern military – controls more than 200 overseas military bases (100 between Turkey and Portugal), which are strategically located. According to General (ret.) Al Gray, former Commandant, US Marine Corps, “The principal threat to Israel’s existence, for the foreseeable future, will remain the threat of an invasion and occupation by heavy armored forces… Achieving military success in a war requires more than lobbing a few hundred missiles… To win a war against Israel, Syria must move armor, infantry and artillery into Israel proper, and then destroy Israeli forces on the ground. This was true in 1948, it was true in 1967 and 1973, and it remains true in today’s Age of Missiles…”

 

If they would simply believe that advanced technology and military systems constitute a proper substitute for the J & S mountain ridges, DA’YE’NOU.

However, today’s High Tech is destined to become tomorrow’s Low Tech. On the other hand, today’s High Ground will remain so tomorrow. Contrary to technology, geography and topography cannot be altered. The most advanced US surveillance systems and satellites – stationed in/over the Persian Gulf area – did not detect Iraq’s invasion of Iran (1980) and Kuwait (1990), and US aircraft could not hit Iraq’s primitive Scud missile launchers (1991). In 2006, Israel’s sophisticated technology and missiles are unable to stop Palestinian Kassam and Katyusha missiles, as long as Israel does not control the Palestinian launching ground.

 

If they would simply ignore the crucial role played by J & S mountain ridges in the deployment of Israel’s reservists, who constitute 75% of Israel’s military, and spared Israel annihilation in 1973, DA’YE’NOU.

However, the switch from non-war to war, in the Mideast, has usually been sudden and lethal, as demonstrated by the 1967 and 1973 wars, as well as by Iraq’s invasion of Iran and Kuwait. A surprise Arab invasion of Israel would accord the invading armored forces a 7:1 advantage until deployment of Israel’s reservists. The more sophisticated the Arab military systems, the shorter the geographic depth of Israel and the more convenient the topography (facing the invading force), the closer would be the battle ground to Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, at a distinct Israeli disadvantage, while deployment of reservists is incomplete. The more accurate, long-range and destructive the Arab missiles, the more substantial the damage to Israel’s military installations (including air force bases), the more havoc at the Jerusalem-Tel Aviv-Haifa “Soft Belly”, which is the home of 70% of Israel’s reservists, and the slower the process of reservists deployment. Israel’s control of the mountain ridges enables a small Israeli regular military force to hold back an unpredictable invasion, thus providing additional critical time for the deployment of reservists. Surveillance systems on the J & S mountain ridges provide Israel with early warning data, which extend all the way to the Persian Gulf. In 1973, it was the control of the Golan Heights northeastern hilltops (overlooking Damascus), J & S mountain ridges and the Sinai, which made it possible to deploy Israel’s reservists, thus averting an Israeli calamity.

 

If they would simply maintain that the Sinai precedent (retreat and demilitarization) applies to J & S, DA’YE’NOU.

 

However, Sinai and J & S are diametrically opposed topographically, geographically and demographically. Thus, a surprise invasion through Sinai (22,000sqkm) would require, at least, 40 hours to reach Israel, thus providing Israel with substantial time for the deployment of reservists. Such an invasion would be effectively confronted from the sparsely populated Negev, which constitutes 2/3 of Israel’s territory and serves as the training platform for most of Israel’s regulars and reservists. On the other hand, a similar invasion through J & S (5,500sqkm) would provide only 10 hours for deployment. It would be confronted from the densely populated, narrow-waistlined coastal plain, which is the home of Israel’s most critical industries, transportation arteries, scientific and population centers, and cannot accommodate a substantial military force. While the Sinai does not possess any topographic advantage over the Negev, the J & S mountain ridges are endowed with a unique topographic edge: A 3,000ft steep slope overtowering the Jordan Valley in the east – the most effective tank obstacle in the region; and a 2,000ft moderate slope – a dream platform of invasion to the 8-15 mile coastal plain. No country – especially not in the violent Mideast – would give away to its sworn enemies a superb tank obstacle and provide them with a tempting invasion platform. Whereas the Sinai giveaway was a calculated risk, a giveaway of the J & S mountain ridges would be a lethal gamble.

 

The flawed world view, which blurs the security irreplaceability of the J & S mountain ridges, is exposed in view of the fact that Israel’s Narrow-Waistline (which is dominated by J & S mountain ridges) is shorter than the Dallas-Ft. Worth Airport, equal to the distance between JFK and La Guardia airports and between Wall Street and Columbia University, as well as equal to a roundtrip between RFK Stadium and the Kennedy Center in Washington, DC.

 

The test of a secure boundary is not whether it facilitates the signing of a peace treaty. The test of a secure boundary is whether it could withstand an unpredictable concerted offensive by a number of Arab countries – assisted by the Palestinians – in the Mideast, which has not experienced an inter-Arab peaceful coexistence during the last 1,300 years. The J & S mountain ridges – the aquifers of 40% of Israel’s water supply – are irreplaceable for the survival of Israel, whose margin of wartime error is close to zero.




Videos

The post-1967 turning point of US-Israel cooperation

Israeli benefits to the US taxpayer exceed US foreign aid to Israel

Iran - A Clear And Present Danger To The USA

Exposing the myth of the Arab demographic time bomb

US-sponsored anti-Israel UN Security Council statement – acumen

*The US’ co-sponsorship of an anti-Israel UN Security Council Statement reflects the return of the State Department’s worldview to the center stage of US foreign policy-making. This was the first time, in six years, that the US enabled the UN Security Council to act against Israel.

*This is not merely a worldview, which is highly critical of Israel, as has been the case since 1948, when Foggy Bottom led the charge against the re-establishment of the Jewish State.

This worldview has systematically undermined US interests, by subordinating the unilateral, independent US national security policy (on Iran’s Ayatollahs, the Muslim Brotherhood, the Palestinian issue, etc.) to a multilateral common denominator with the anti-US and anti-Israel UN and international organizations, as well as the vacillating and terrorists-appeasing Europe.

*It has sacrificed Middle East reality on the altar of wishful-thinking, assuming that the establishment of a Palestinian state would fulfill Palestinian aspirations, advance the cause of peace, reduce terrorism and regional instability; thus, enhancing US interests.

*However, the reality of the Middle East and Jordan and the rogue Palestinian track record lend credence to the assumption that a Palestinian state west of the Jordan River would doom the pro-US Hashemite regime east of the River, yielding traumatic ripple effects, regionally and globally:

^Replace the relatively-moderate Hashemite regime with either a rogue Palestinian regime, a Muslim Brotherhood regime, or other rogue regimes;
^Transform Jordan into a chaotic state, similar to Libya, Syria, Iraq and Yemen, which would be leveraged by Iran’s Ayatollahs to intensify their encirclement of the pro-US Saudi regime;
^Convert Jordan into a major arena of regional and global Islamic terrorism;
^Trigger a domino scenario into the Arabian Peninsula, which could topple all pro-US, oil-producing Arab regimes;
^Imperil the supply of Persian Gulf oil, which would be held hostage by anti-US entities, catapulting the price at the pump;
^Jeopardize major naval routes of global trade between Asia and Europe through the Indian Ocean, the Red Sea and the Suez Canal;
^Intensify epicenters of regional and global terrorism and drug trafficking;
^Generate a robust tailwind to US’ adversaries (Russia and China) and enemies (Iran’s Ayatollahs, the Muslim Brotherhood and ISIS) and a powerful headwind to US economic and national security interests.

*The State Department assumes that Palestinian terrorism – just like Islamic terrorism – is driven by despair, ignoring the fact that Palestinian terrorism has been driven (for the last 100 years) by the vision to erase the “infidel” Jewish entity from “the abode of Islam,” as stated by the charters of Fatah (1959) and the PLO (1964), 8 and 3 years before the Jewish State reunited Jerusalem and reasserted itself in Judea and Samaria (the West Bank).

*Aspiring for a Palestinian state, and viewing Israel’s control of Judea and Samaria as an obstacle to peace, ignores the Arab view of the Palestinians as a role model of intra-Arab subversion, terrorism, corruption and treachery. Moreover, the State Department has held the view that the Palestinian issue is the crux of the Arab-Israeli conflict and a central to Arab interests, which has been refuted by the Abraham Accords. The latter ignored the State Department, sidestepped the Palestinian issue and therefore came to fruition.

*The State Department overlooks the centrality of the Palestinian Authority’s hate education, which has become the most effective production-line of terrorists, and the most authentic reflection of the Palestinian Authority’s worldview and vision.

*The State Department has also taken lightly the Palestinian Authority’s mosque incitement, public glorification of terrorists and monthly allowances to families of terrorists, which have documented its rogue and terroristic nature (walk), notwithstanding its peaceful diplomatic rhetoric (talk).

*The State Department’s eagerness to welcome the Palestinian issue in a “red carpet” manner – contrary to the “shabby doormat” extended to Palestinians by Arabs – and its determination to promote the establishment of a Palestinian state, along with its embrace of Iran’s Ayatollahs and the Muslim Brotherhood, have been interpreted by rogue regimes and organizations as weakness.

Experience suggests that weakness invites the wolves, including wolves which aim to bring “The Great Satan” to submission throughout the world as well as the US mainland.

Support Appreciated

 




Videos

The post-1967 turning point of US-Israel cooperation

Israeli benefits to the US taxpayer exceed US foreign aid to Israel

Iran - A Clear And Present Danger To The USA

Exposing the myth of the Arab demographic time bomb